Skip to main content

Bali bombers to seek Muslim edict on validity of penalty


THREE Islamic militants on death row for the 2002 Bali bombings met their families yesterday as their lawyer said they would seek an edict from Indonesia's Muslim body on the legality of execution by shooting.The three - Imam Samudra, Amrozi and Mukhlas - could face possibly a firing squad within a month unless they seek presidential clemency, an option which they have already ruled out.Last week, prosecutors handed over copies of a Supreme Court verdict rejecting the men's final appeal, marking the start of a 30-day deadline for them to request clemency or be executed.The three men were sentenced to death for their role in two nightclub blasts on Bali's Kuta strip on October 12, 2002, in which 202 people died, mostly foreign tourists.


The attacks were blamed on the South-East Asian militant group Jemaah Islamiah.Samudra's mother, wife and four children visited the men in prison on Nusakambangan island, off the southern coast of Java.Samudra's family travelled with the relatives of Amrozi and Mukhlas, accompanied by one of the men's lawyers, Achmad Michdan.Mr Michdan said the defence team was adamant in its rejection of the Supreme Court verdict on the grounds that the case review did not involve a retrial and re-examination of witnesses."We want the panel of judges who heard the case to be investigated, " Mr Michdan said.He said the Bali bombers' lawyers would lodge a request for the Supreme Court to hear the appeal case again.


The lawyers would also send a letter to the Indonesian Council of Ulema, the country's highest authority on Islam, asking it to issue a fatwa on the legality of execution by shooting.The three convicts have asked to be beheaded, rather than killed by firing squad.Previously, the bombers said in a statement read out by their lawyers, that if they were executed, their blood would "become the light for the faithful ones and burning hellfire for the infidels and hypocrites".

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Debate Islam in Indonesia

http://www.thejakar taglobe.com/ opinion/interloc utors-of- indonesian- islam/560447 Interlocutors of Indonesian Islam Ahmad Najib Burhani | December 08, 2012 A few months ago, the Japanese anthropologist Mitsuo Nakamura told me that studying Nahdlatul Ulama as an organization was beyond the imagination of any American scholar from the 1950s to the ’70s. But he is not the only academic to have noticed this. George McT. Kahin of Cornell University stated the same thing. Even NU-expert Martin van Bruinessen was not expecting to study NU as his primary focus when he came to Indonesia for the first time in the 1980s.   During the early decades of Indonesian independence, NU was relatively unorganized and its management was largely based on the authority of religious teachers ( kyai ). Of course there were a number of scholars who studied NU-affiliated religious schools ( pesantren ) and its kyai, but not NU as an organization.   Even though NU was one of the ...

Greenpeace boycott Palm oil products Duta Palma

Environmental organization Greenpeace India has demanded that all Indian palm oil importers and corporate consumers immediately stop palm oil sourcing from Indonesian companies like Duta Palma who make palm oil by destroying forests and tiger habitat in Indonesia. An investigative report issued by Greenpeace Indonesia released on Thursday links India's growing palm oil imports and corporate apathy to Duta Palma's destruction of hundreds of acres of Indonesian rainforests and tiger habitat in complete disregard of Indonesian government&# 39;s moratorium on such activities in the rainforest. Big Indian corporates like Ruchi Soya, Adani -Wilmar, Godrej Industries, Parle, Britannia are among many who use Indonesian palm oil in their products on a large scale.  "Duta Palma's dirty oil could well be entering into their supply chains. Yet, so far, no Indian company has taken any visible steps to clean up their supply chain, to delink their brands from the ...

Blasphemy in the name of religion

The Asian Legal Resource Centre (ALRC) wishes to bring the attention of the Human Rights Council (HRC) to violations of the right to the freedom of expression and opinion that are being engendered through the use of Indonesia’s legal provisions prohibiting blasphemy. Religious blasphemy is prohibited in Indonesia under Law No. 1/PNPS/1965, with such provisions also being later adopted within the Penal Code (KUHP) under Article 156a. Paragraph (a) of this article uses vague language, which opens the door to abusive uses of this provision, to prohibit any acts and expression of views considered to be blasphemous, and carries a maximum punishment of five years imprisonment. A similar maximum punishment is also carried by paragraph (b) of the article, which prohibits any acts and expression of views calling for others to embrace atheism. Alexander Aan is an atheist currently undergoing a trial at the Muaro Sijunjung District Court, West Sumatra. According to his lawyers from ...