Skip to main content

Unilever and Nestle, stop buying palm oil from Indonesia's largest producer


Two leading consumer-goods companies, Unilever and Nestle, have stopped buying palm oil for use in its products from Indonesia's largest producer, Sinar Mas.

The firm is accused by Greenpeace, the environmental activists, of illegally clearing forests in Indonesia for its plantations.

Sinar Mas denies the claims and says it has hired independent auditors to prove its case.

In a telephone interview on Tuesday to Al Jazeera, Vikram Agarwal, Unilever Asia's vice-president of supply management in Singapore, said: "Unilever's decision to suspend these purchases of palm oil was triggered by serious charges made against the company. Not just in December 2009, but going back to when the first quotes appeared from Greenpeace in April 2008, as well from other NGOs [non-governmental organisations] and independent auditors."

He said the purpose of "making our purchases as of now is to make it clear to them that the burden of proof now rests with them [Sinar Mas] to either dismiss these allegations or to come out with some verifiable actions that will satisfy everybody, that they are going to take measures to rectify the situation."

Southeast Asia is the world's biggest supplier of palm oil, with Malaysia having more than 4.5 million hectares of palm plantations. Indonesia has about seven million hectares. The two countries account for 90 per cent of global production.

Rainforest loss

Environmental groups have said that palm oil is the most significant cause of rainforest loss in these countries.

One study has said that 86 per cent of Malaysian deforestation between 1995 and 2000 was to make way for palm plantations.

It is believed by some groups that Indonesia has already lost about 75 per cent of its original forest.

But growers have said that the palm-oil sector provides employment to about 1.4 million Malaysians, and, according to Sinar Mas, 4.5 million Indonesians are directly employed in the palm-oil sector .

It is estimated that in 2009 Indonesia and Malaysia earned about $10bn and $15bn, respectively, from palm-oil exports

Comments

opo bener ?

Popular posts from this blog

Greenpeace boycott Palm oil products Duta Palma

Environmental organization Greenpeace India has demanded that all Indian palm oil importers and corporate consumers immediately stop palm oil sourcing from Indonesian companies like Duta Palma who make palm oil by destroying forests and tiger habitat in Indonesia. An investigative report issued by Greenpeace Indonesia released on Thursday links India's growing palm oil imports and corporate apathy to Duta Palma's destruction of hundreds of acres of Indonesian rainforests and tiger habitat in complete disregard of Indonesian government&# 39;s moratorium on such activities in the rainforest. Big Indian corporates like Ruchi Soya, Adani -Wilmar, Godrej Industries, Parle, Britannia are among many who use Indonesian palm oil in their products on a large scale.  "Duta Palma's dirty oil could well be entering into their supply chains. Yet, so far, no Indian company has taken any visible steps to clean up their supply chain, to delink their brands from the ...

If Soeharto became National Hero

Three short years after his death, Indonesia's dictator Suharto has been   nominated to a shortlist to be designated a "National Hero." The final decision   rests with President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono. and any honors will likely be   announced on November 10, Heroes’ Day. President Obama is scheduled to visit  Indonesia around that date.  After Suharto died in January 2008, Indonesia's former dictator General Suharto   has died in bed and not in jail, escaping justice for his numerous crimes in   East Timor and throughout the Indonesian archipelago. One of the worst mass   murderers of the 20th century, his death tolls still shock... We cannot forget that the United States government consistently supported   Suharto and his regime. As the corpses piled up after his coup and darkness   descended on Indonesia, his cheerleaders in the U.S. welcomed the "gleam of   light in Asia." In the pursuit of realpolitik, U.S. administration a...

Blasphemy in the name of religion

The Asian Legal Resource Centre (ALRC) wishes to bring the attention of the Human Rights Council (HRC) to violations of the right to the freedom of expression and opinion that are being engendered through the use of Indonesia’s legal provisions prohibiting blasphemy. Religious blasphemy is prohibited in Indonesia under Law No. 1/PNPS/1965, with such provisions also being later adopted within the Penal Code (KUHP) under Article 156a. Paragraph (a) of this article uses vague language, which opens the door to abusive uses of this provision, to prohibit any acts and expression of views considered to be blasphemous, and carries a maximum punishment of five years imprisonment. A similar maximum punishment is also carried by paragraph (b) of the article, which prohibits any acts and expression of views calling for others to embrace atheism. Alexander Aan is an atheist currently undergoing a trial at the Muaro Sijunjung District Court, West Sumatra. According to his lawyers from ...