Skip to main content

Merrill faces civil suit in Jakarta


A dispute between Merrill Lynch and an Indonesian private banking client will be heard by a Jakarta court, a judge ruled yesterday, raising the stakes in a battle in which Singaporean courts have already ruled twice in the bank's favour.Indonesian police have declared Lily Widjaja, the head of Merrill's Jakarta office, and Rahul Malhotra, managing director of its Singapore office, suspects in a parallel but related criminal case. They are accused of embezzlement and defamation in relation to the civil case between the bank and the client.

The civil suit is one of several involving Indonesians who claim banks treated them unfairly or failed fully to inform them about products on which they suffered heavy losses when stock markets and the rupiah crashed last year.Foreigners will also be watching it to assess the current state of Indonesia's notoriously unpredictable legal system.Merrill's dispute with Prem Harjani and his company, Renaissance Capital, began when he used a $17m credit line with Merrill's Singapore office to buy $14m of shares in Triwira Insanlestari, an Indonesia-listed company, in mid-2008.Merrill said the credit line could not be used to buy Indonesian stocks and asked Mr Harjani to repay the money. Merrill began selling the purchased Triwira shares after no money was received within three days but suffered significant losses because global stock markets had crashed in the interim.

Soon after, Mr Harjani repaid $2m but, to collect the rest, Merrill filed a suit in Singapore. The bank succeeded in freezing Mr Harjani's assets there and won when the Indonesian appealed.While the dispute was working its way through the Singapore courts, Mr Harjani filed a suit in Jakarta, a common strategy for Indonesians involved in legal battles overseas.Mr Hajani is claiming for Rp1,000bn ($97m) in damages, saying Merrill sold his shares without permission. One of his lawyers said all the evidence would come out in court. Hearings are due to start in a fortnight.Merrill said the action in Indonesia was "without merit because the Indonesia office was never involved in the transactions" .Frans Hendra Winata, Merrill's lawyer in the civil case, said after yesterday's hearing: "I'm still optimistic about the final outcome because we have very strong supporting evidence." He said the bank might appeal against yesterday's decision.Mr Winata said the criminal case against Ms Widjaja was also baseless. "How can you consider her a suspect when there was no relationship [between her and Mr Harjani] at all," she said.

Citibank and Bank Danamon, a local bank controlled by Singapore's Temasek Holdings, are among the other institutions that have faced legal claims over the performance of financial products over the past year.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Greenpeace boycott Palm oil products Duta Palma

Environmental organization Greenpeace India has demanded that all Indian palm oil importers and corporate consumers immediately stop palm oil sourcing from Indonesian companies like Duta Palma who make palm oil by destroying forests and tiger habitat in Indonesia. An investigative report issued by Greenpeace Indonesia released on Thursday links India's growing palm oil imports and corporate apathy to Duta Palma's destruction of hundreds of acres of Indonesian rainforests and tiger habitat in complete disregard of Indonesian government&# 39;s moratorium on such activities in the rainforest. Big Indian corporates like Ruchi Soya, Adani -Wilmar, Godrej Industries, Parle, Britannia are among many who use Indonesian palm oil in their products on a large scale.  "Duta Palma's dirty oil could well be entering into their supply chains. Yet, so far, no Indian company has taken any visible steps to clean up their supply chain, to delink their brands from the ...

Blasphemy in the name of religion

The Asian Legal Resource Centre (ALRC) wishes to bring the attention of the Human Rights Council (HRC) to violations of the right to the freedom of expression and opinion that are being engendered through the use of Indonesia’s legal provisions prohibiting blasphemy. Religious blasphemy is prohibited in Indonesia under Law No. 1/PNPS/1965, with such provisions also being later adopted within the Penal Code (KUHP) under Article 156a. Paragraph (a) of this article uses vague language, which opens the door to abusive uses of this provision, to prohibit any acts and expression of views considered to be blasphemous, and carries a maximum punishment of five years imprisonment. A similar maximum punishment is also carried by paragraph (b) of the article, which prohibits any acts and expression of views calling for others to embrace atheism. Alexander Aan is an atheist currently undergoing a trial at the Muaro Sijunjung District Court, West Sumatra. According to his lawyers from ...

Australia acknowledge INDONESIAN not a terrorist state

INDONESIA, the world's most populous Muslim nation and the site of more Australian deaths at the hands of terrorists than any other country, will not be included in a list of 10 countries targeted for toughened visa screening rules aimed at thwarting terror attacks. As Kevin Rudd released his government's long-awaited counter-terrorism white paper yesterday, The Australian has learnt that Indonesia, Pakistan and India will not be among the 10 countries singled out for for toughened visa screening. This is despite those countries playing host to the overwhelming number of regional terror attacks.Yemen and Somalia -- identified in the white paper as the emerging epicentres of radical Islamic terrorism -- will be included.The white paper fingers home grown extremists -- as opposed to transnational groups such as al-Qa'ida -- as the main terror threat now confronting Australia.The Prime Minister said the threat of terrorism had become a "persistent and permanent feature...